As the Presidential race heats up funding of social programs is always a hot topic.
Social Security has become a political football with politicians on both sides having plans for reform.
The Social Security program is, by definition, a liberal program. It provides a safety net for society’s most vulnerable and least able to contribute. Most of those on the right believe the system is in serious need of reform and a focus on individual responsibility is needed. This presidential debate has brought out some expressive rhetoric from both sides.
Republicans have proposed means-testing, which entails cutting benefits for higher-income workers.
Currently, high-income workers pay more into the system, and in turn receive higher benefits. New Jersey Governor and Presidential hopeful, Chris Christie, has proposed denying benefits to individuals with incomes over $200,000/year. The reasoning is that individuals with that level of income can be responsible for their own financial planning and don’t require government support. The opposing perspective is that high earners put the most money into the system, and it seems unfair to bar them from taking anything out.
Another Republican proposal is privatization of the Social Security program.
Privatization would route Social Security tax revenue into personal retirement accounts. The hope is that these accounts will be invested into high-yield stocks which will provide a better return on investment than the current system. This would also allow workers to have control over their own retirement investments, which appeals greatly to proponents of free-market economics and libertarian wing of the Republican Party. The downside is that it would put Social Security funding at the capricious whims of the stock market.
On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders has been the most aggressive about expanding Social Security programs.
He has proposed altering the cost-of-living adjustments so beneficiaries are more likely to receive an annual increase. Currently, the cost-of-living increases are based on a price index for wage earners; he proposes using a special price index for the elderly. This price index weighs housing and health care more heavily as they make up a larger percentage of the typical senior’s budget. His view is that in light of increasing poverty rates among seniors, it only makes sense to increase the safety net. His opponents point out that he does not have a plan to pay for an expansion of benefits. His belief is the system is solvent and can remain funded with only moderate adjustments.
Regardless of politics, Social Security is an important program that benefits millions of Americans.
Hopefully, those in Washington will do what is needed to keep the system funded and operating smoothly. Both sides make valid arguments; the government should help those who need assistance, but at the same time, it’s important to manage taxpayer money effectively.
If you are one of the millions of Americans who have been denied benefits, contact the attorneys at Bemis, Roach and Reed today for a free consultation. We have the knowledge and experience you need to appeal your disability claim successfully. If you do not win benefits, there will be no charge to you.
Call 512-454-4000 and get help NOW.
Your Free Initial Consultation
At Bemis, Roach and Reed, if we can't help you, we will try to find the right attorneys for you.
We offer each of our prospective clients a free no obligation one hour phone or office consultation to see if we can help you and if you are comfortable with us. We know how difficult a time like this can be and how hard the decisions are. If we can be of assistance to you and help you find a solution to your issue we will even if that means referring you to another attorney.
Or simply call 512-454-4000
to schedule your
Let's get you Started:
If you could provide us with some basic information about your claim we will get right back with you with a free case evaluation and schedule your Free Consultation Today.